• 14 June 2024

From Tweets to Votes: The Growing Influence of Social Media in Elections

Jul 25, 2023

In recent years, the influence of social media in elections has grown exponentially, transforming the political landscape and reshaping the way voters engage with candidates and campaigns. With the rise of platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, political messages can reach millions in seconds, amplifying their impact like never before. As social media continues to evolve, its role in elections has become a subject of intense scrutiny and debate. In this article, we delve into the growing significance of social media in electoral processes, examining its implications, challenges, and potential effects on democracy worldwide.

Continent-wise analysis of how social media changed the game of politics over the decades

North America:
  • 2000s: Social media platforms started gaining popularity during this period, with early adopters using platforms like MySpace and Friendster for personal networking.
  • 2010s: The rise of Facebook and Twitter significantly impacted political communication and mobilization. Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign was one of the first to leverage social media extensively, using it as a platform for fundraising and grassroots organizing.
  • 2020s: Social media’s influence on politics became more evident during this decade. Political campaigns heavily relied on platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok to reach younger demographics. Social media also played a significant role in organizing protests and movements, such as the Black Lives Matter demonstrations.
Europe:
  • 2000s: Social media platforms gained traction in Europe, with Facebook and Twitter becoming popular among users. However, their influence on politics was still in its early stages.
  • 2010s: Social media’s impact on politics in Europe became more pronounced during this decade. Political parties and candidates started using platforms for targeted advertising and engaging with voters.
  • 2020s: Social media became an integral part of election campaigns across Europe. Leaders and politicians embraced live streaming and interactive features to connect with constituents directly.
Asia:
  • 2000s: Social media platforms slowly gained popularity in Asian countries, with some regions being more receptive than others.
  • 2010s: The rise of social media influencers and digital activism emerged in Asian countries, leading to increased political engagement among younger demographics.
  • 2020s: Social media’s influence on politics in Asia reached new heights, with leaders using platforms like Weibo in China and LINE in Japan to communicate with citizens. Social media also played a crucial role in organizing protests and social movements in countries like Hong Kong and India.
Africa:
  • 2000s: Social media adoption in Africa was relatively slow during this period, with limited internet access and infrastructure challenges.
  • 2010s: The growth of mobile internet and smartphones led to a surge in social media use across Africa. Political parties and candidates started leveraging platforms like WhatsApp and Twitter for election campaigns.
  • 2020s: Social media’s impact on politics in Africa became more significant. Social media platforms played a vital role in mobilizing citizens and amplifying political messages.
South America:
  • 2000s: Social media adoption in South America followed a similar trajectory to other regions, with platforms like Orkut and Hi5 gaining popularity.
  • 2010s: Social media’s influence on politics in South America became evident during this decade. Leaders and politicians started using platforms like Facebook and Twitter for political communication and campaigning.
  • 2020s: Social media played a crucial role in shaping political discourse in South American countries, with platforms being used for both positive and negative campaign strategies.

Overall, social media’s influence on politics has evolved significantly across different continents over the years. It has transformed political communication, mobilization, and citizen engagement, making it a crucial factor in modern-day politics worldwide.

Instances of widespread use of social media in recent elections  from different countries:

USA 2020 Presidential Election:

Social media played a pivotal role in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Both major candidates, Donald Trump and Joe Biden, extensively used platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube to communicate with voters and share their policy positions. They used targeted advertising to reach specific voter demographics and mobilize their respective bases. The election saw record-breaking engagement on social media, with tweets, posts, and videos going viral and shaping political narratives. (Source: The Washington Post, BBC News)

UK 2022 General Election:

In the 2022 UK general election, social media played a prominent role in the political landscape. Political parties and candidates used platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok to engage with voters and promote their manifestos. Social media influencers also emerged as key players, endorsing candidates and mobilizing young voters. Live streaming and interactive features were used for virtual town halls and Q&A sessions. (Source: The Guardian, The Telegraph)

India 2019 General Election:

The 2019 Indian general election witnessed a significant surge in social media usage for political campaigns. Political parties extensively used WhatsApp and Twitter to reach voters, particularly in rural areas. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) utilized data analytics and targeted advertising on platforms like Facebook to reach specific voter segments. The election saw viral campaigns, hashtags, and meme culture influencing public discourse and voter behavior. (Source: BBC News, Quartz India)

Australia 2022 Federal Election:

In the 2022 Australian federal election, social media played a crucial role in engaging voters. Political parties actively used platforms like Instagram and Snapchat to connect with younger demographics. The use of social media influencers, particularly on Instagram, became prevalent, with influencers endorsing candidates and promoting their policies. Live debates and campaign events were streamed on various social media platforms to reach wider audiences. (Source: The Guardian, News.com.au)

Canada 2023 Federal Election:

The 2023 Canadian federal election saw a significant increase in social media engagement among political parties and candidates. Social media platforms like Twitter, YouTube, and TikTok were used to connect with voters and share campaign messages. The use of data-driven microtargeting on platforms like Facebook became a notable strategy for reaching specific voter groups. Political memes and viral content also shaped public opinion and discussions during the election. (Source: CBC, Global News)

Other Nations:

Across the globe, other nations have also witnessed the widespread use of social media in recent elections. Countries like Brazil, Nigeria, and South Korea have seen significant social media engagement in their electoral processes. Social media platforms have become instrumental in mobilizing young voters, amplifying political messages, and influencing public discourse in these countries. (Source: Reuters, Quartz Africa, The Korea Times)

These examples demonstrate the growing influence of social media in shaping political campaigns, mobilizing voters, and winning elections in various countries up to the year 2023. Social media’s impact on politics continues to evolve, playing a pivotal role in modern-day political communication and strategies.

Social media and Countries
New Media and Indian Politics: Impact on Democracy

New media platforms like social media, websites, and blogs have revolutionized political communication in Indian politics. They provide direct access for politicians to engage with citizens, run targeted campaigns, and mobilize voters.

Advantages of New Media
  • Direct Communication: Politicians reach a broad audience without traditional media intermediaries.
  • Political Campaigning: Parties use social media for targeted ads and sharing manifestos.
  • Voter Mobilization: Social media plays a key role in encouraging voter participation.
Challenges and Concerns:
  • Dissemination of Misinformation: Fake news and misinformation spread rapidly, causing social tensions.
  • Influence on Political Discourse: Social media can create echo chambers and polarization.
  • Impact on Legacy Media: Traditional media faces economic challenges, affecting newsroom capacities.
  • Veracity of Information: Distinguishing factual reporting from sensationalized content becomes difficult.

Post-Truth Dilemma:

  • Rise of Fake News: False stories masquerade as legitimate news, misleading the public.
  • Watchdog Press: Journalists struggle to counter misinformation effectively.
  • Political Mouthpiece: Social media enables politicians to communicate directly to followers.
  • Direct Communication with Voters: 72% of U.S. adults use social media, allowing politicians to reach a large electorate directly. (Source: Pew Research Center)
  • Amplification of Political Messages: Moreover, twitter reported over 7 billion impressions for election-related tweets in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. (Source: Twitter)
  • Political Mobilization and Activism: During the Arab Spring, Twitter recorded over 3 million tweets related to the movement in just two months. (Source: First Monday Journal)
  • Dissemination of Information and Misinformation: False news spreads 70% faster than true news on platforms like Twitter, according to a study in Science.
  • Personalized Political Campaigns: Cambridge Analytica utilized Facebook data to create highly targeted political ads during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. (Source: The Guardian)
  • Political Polarization and Echo Chambers: 64% of U.S. adults experience “echo chambers” on social media, limiting exposure to diverse viewpoints. (Source: Pew Research Center)
  • Influence on Elections and Political Outcomes: In the 2019 Indian general elections, around 220 million Indians were active on Facebook during the election period. (Source: The Economic Times)
  • Citizen Journalism and Accountability: During the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests, citizen journalists documented and shared incidents of police brutality on social media, promoting accountability. (Source: The Guardian)
  • Global Political Conversations: Facebook’s 2.8 billion monthly active users enable global discussions and political discourse. (Source: Statista)
  • Influencing Public Policy: Furthermore, one in every five Americans has participated in online political or social petitioning, according to a study in Nature Communications. (Source: Nature Communications)

The Dark Side Of Politics And Politicians’ Use Of these platforms Includes

Misinformation Campaigns: False news stories are 70% more likely to be retweeted than true stories, enabling politicians to exploit social media to advance agendas and smear opponents. (Source: Science)
 During the 2016 U.S. presidential election, Russia orchestrated a misinformation campaign to influence public opinion. (Source: U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee Report)
Hateful Content and Online Harassment: Furthermore, social media platforms serve as breeding grounds for hate speech and harassment, affecting 37% of American adults who experience severe online harassment. Even politicians, including prominent figures, encounter threats and harassment on these platforms. (Source: ADL)
 U.S. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez received death threats on Twitter in 2020. (Source: BBC News)
Polarization and Divisive Rhetoric: Social media exacerbates political polarization, with politicians using divisive language to mobilize supporters. 64% of U.S. adults experience “echo chambers,” reinforcing like-minded opinions. (Source: Pew Research Center)
 Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s polarizing tweets fueled both support and opposition. (Source: The New York Times)
Manipulation of Social Media Algorithms: Politicians manipulate algorithms through sponsored posts, bots, and microtargeting to increase visibility and engage specific voter groups.
Cambridge Analytica used microtargeting to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. (Source: The Guardian)
⦁ These examples show how social media misuse by politicians involves misinformation, hate speech, harassment, and manipulation, impacting public discourse and democratic processes.

A Summary Of Global Social Media Growth

Additionally, the number of global social media users increased from 4.62 billion in January 2022 to 4.72 billion in January 2023, signifying a 3% growth of +137 million users year on year. Furthermore, projections indicate further growth over the remaining year.

As of April, the number of total users are still going up, but the average time on the internet has slightly decreased, as we’ll see.

Direct Communication with Voters:

According to a survey by Pew Research Center, as of 2021, 72% of U.S. adults reported using at least one social media platform. Furthermore, this widespread adoption has enabled politicians to directly reach a large portion of the electorate. (Source: Pew Research Center)

Amplification of Political Messages:

Furthermore, in the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Twitter reported that tweets related to the election garnered over 7 billion impressions in a mere 30 days leading up to Election Day. This striking figure illustrates the immense reach and amplification potential of political messages on social media platforms.(Source: Twitter)

Political Mobilization and Activism:

Moreover, the Arab Spring, a series of pro-democracy uprisings across the Middle East and North Africa in 2010-2012, is frequently cited as a significant instance of political mobilization through social media. During this period, Twitter recorded over 3 million tweets related to the Arab Spring in just two months. (Source: First Monday Journal)

Dissemination of Information and Misinformation:

A study published in the journal Science found that false news spreads significantly faster and reaches more people on platforms like Twitter than true news. False news stories were 70% more likely to be retweeted than true stories. (Source: Science)

Personalized Political Campaigns:

Cambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm, gained access to the Facebook data of millions of users during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Furthermore, they harnessed this data to create highly targeted and personalized political advertisements, exemplifying the potential of microtargeting on social media.(Source: The Guardian)

Political Polarization and Echo Chambers:

Additionally, research by the Pew Research Center reveals that 64% of U.S. adults feel the term “echo chamber” aptly describes their experiences, highlighting the prevalence of like-minded opinions and limited exposure to opposing viewpoints on these platforms.(Source: Pew Research Center)

Influence on Elections and Political Outcomes:

Additionally, in the 2019 Indian general elections, it played a crucial role. Furthermore, political parties and candidates heavily invested in digital campaigns, utilizing the platform’s reach and influence to effectively connect with voters. According to reports, around 220 million Indians were active on Facebook during the election period. (Source: The Economic Times)

Citizen Journalism and Accountability:

During the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests, citizen journalists played a significant role in documenting and sharing incidents of police brutality and racial injustice. This grassroots reporting brought greater accountability to law enforcement and policymakers. (Source: The Guardian)

Global Political Conversations:

Moreover, as of 2021, Facebook boasts over 2.8 billion monthly active users, establishing itself as a platform for global conversations and discussions. Also, its diverse user base facilitates political discourse and enables people from different countries to share perspectives on various global issues. (Source: Statista)

Influencing Public Policy:

In 2019, a study published in the journal Nature Communications found that generally, one in every five Americans has participated in some form of political or social online petitioning. Generally, this illustrates the significant impact of activism on public policy and government decision-making. (Source: Nature Communications)

In conclusion

Moreover, social media’s dominance in the digital revolution has generally transformed the political and communication landscape. Additionally, it enables direct engagement between politicians and voters, with instances of political mobilization and activism being facilitated. Furthermore, political messages are amplified on a global scale. However, challenges like misinformation, polarization, and data privacy must be addressed to harness the positive potential in shaping a more informed, engaged, and responsible political discourse for the future

Positive and negative impacts of social media on politics and society

Special Thanks and Credits

We extend our heartfelt gratitude to Pew Research Center, for providing valuable insights, data, and images for our blog. Basically, your contribution has enriched our content and allowed us to deliver a more informative and engaging experience to our readers. We sincerely appreciate your collaboration and look forward to future partnerships.

Thank you for being an essential part of our journey!

Also, read https://thelogicalpie.com/losing-connection-to-reality/health-fitness

3 thoughts on “From Tweets to Votes: The Growing Influence of Social Media in Elections”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *